University of Southern California

Volume 81, Number 1 (November, 2007)

  • xxx

    Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy
    Article by Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley

    Recent social science research suggests that many if not most judgments about criminal liability and punishment for serious wrongdoing are intuitional rather than reasoned. Further, such intuitions of justice are nuanced and widely shared, even though they concern matters that seem quite complex and subjective. While people may debate the source of these intuitions, it seems clear that, whatever their source, it must be one that is insulated from the influence of much of human experience because...

  • xxx

    Rebuilding Illinois Brick: A Functionalist Approach to the Indirect Purchaser Rule
    Article by Barak D. Richman & Christopher R. Murray

    The landmark case of Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, which denied standing to indirect purchasers to sue antitrust violators, has been subjected to steady and widespread criticism since it was decided in 1977. Despite three decades of dissatisfaction, however, debate over indirect purchaser standing has failed to generate satisfying solutions that meet the objectives of antitrust law and reflect its underlying principles. We attribute the lack of creative alternatives to an undue emphasis on leg...

  • xxx

    Looking Behind the Curtain: Applying Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act to Businesses Behind Commercial Websites
    Note by Kenneth Kronstadt

    In 1990, Congress enacted the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA” or the “Act”) with the goal of eliminating discrimination against disabled Americans by providing clear, strong, consistent, and enforceable standards to combat the type of discrimination people with disabilities face in their everyday lives. The ADA is the force behind the wheelchair ramps so common in American buildings, the wide doors and large bathroom stalls to accommodate the disabled, the talking ATMs to assist indiv...

  • xxx

    No More Playing Favorites: Reconsidering the Conclusive Congressional Presumption that Intercollegiate Athletics are Substantially Related to Educational Purposes
    Note by Gabriel Morgan

    Athletic competition strengthens not only athletes’ bodies, but also their minds by training them in the values of self-discipline, self-sacrifice, hard work, and the pursuit of excellence. In addition, athletes learn important lessons on social values, such as leadership, cooperation, camaraderie, and collective responsibility through participation in competitive events. The ability of athletic competitions to instill such desirable values in their participants potentially enables intercollegia...

  • xxx

    Would Californians Have the Courage of Their Convictions in the Face of a Fully Functioning Death Penalty?
    Postscript (Response) by Jean Rosenbluth

    Responding to Judge Arthur L. Alarcón, Remedies for California’s Death Row Deadlock, 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 697 (2007). Californians overwhelmingly support the death penalty, we are told. In the most recent Field Poll, conducted in 2006, nearly two-thirds of the State’s denizens expressed support for this harshest of penalties when imposed for the most serious crimes. But I wonder if their support is something like my opposition: as lukewarm as the Chinese food I had delivered last night. Perhaps...

  • xxx

    Response to Courage of Their Convictions
    Postscript (Response) by Yael V. Levy

    Responding to Jean Rosenbluth, Would Californians Have the Courage of Their Convictions in the Face of Fully Functioning Death Penalty?, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. Postscript 1 (2008). I applaud Jean Rosenbluth for examining a question that has been troubling me since I relocated to California from New York last summer: would Californians support capital punishment if the State actually executed the almost 700 death eligible inmates who languish on death row for an average of eighteen years, and at l...

  • xxx

    Arnold, Digital Media, and the Resurrection of Boyd
    Postscript (Comment) by Brian M. Hoffstadt

    In the fall of 2006, United States District Judge Dean D. Pregerson handed down United States v. Arnold, which held that U.S. Customs agents violated the Fourth Amendment when they searched a laptop computer belonging to an inbound international traveler at Los Angeles International Airport without any particularized suspicion. The Ninth Circuit recently overturned the district court’s ruling, but the district court’s analytical approach remains of vital interest. That is because the decision wa...

Donate

Make a tax deductible contribution to the Southern California Law Review.

  • Donate

Sponsors

  • Irell & Manella
  • Jones Day

Donors

Hosted By

  • USC Gould School of Law